🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume nuclear negotiations with the United States as long as it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared fresh requests had come from mediators to restart talks with the US government. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Route

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and mentally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Previous Negotiations Suddenly Concluded

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and hostile end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that culminated with the US president asserting the locations had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iranian officials declared the partnership proposal was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be reintroduced in some form if talks reopen.

The American leader in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the conference, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the concept of global regulations, Araghchi stated the 12-day war demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by military means. He said the attacks commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making confidence hard to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the western countries that had always tried to impose their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be active and continues the ultimate answer to address disagreements, but its standards, rules and principles must be adhered to."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of respect and respect, they will get a answer in the same tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He stated: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but were unable to break. The Iranian people have become more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the wake of this invasion."