🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.